Diferencias de género en la participación en competiciones entre tenistas júnior según la edad

Autores/as

  • Issadam Khusni Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia.
  • Tomoliyus Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia.
  • Abdul Alim Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia.
  • Hilman Nurmahdi Universidad de Oxford, Indonesia.
  • Ismail Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia.

Palabras clave:

Tenistas, Competición, Edad, Género

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar el nivel de participación de los tenistas júnior en competiciones nacionales en función de la edad y el género. Los autores realizaron una investigación cuantitativa mediante un análisis comparativo y descriptivo, basado en la documentación y los datos relativos al número de participantes de los informes oficiales de los torneos nacionales (TDP) reconocidos por la PELTI durante el período 2024. Se seleccionaron aleatoriamente un total de 14 campeonatos nacionales de tenis, en los que participaron 2.580 jugadores. Los resultados indicaron que la participación de los jugadores júnior en las competiciones nacionales difería significativamente según el género (p < 0,05). Descriptivamente, el número medio de participantes masculinos fue superior al de participantes femeninas. No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la participación de los jugadores júnior entre los diferentes grupos de edad (A10, A12, A14 y A16) (p > 0,05). Descriptivamente, los niveles más bajos de participación se observaron en las categorías de edad A10 y A16. Se espera que los resultados de este estudio sirvan como consideración para la determinación de políticas en el ámbito del tenis y como referencia para investigaciones más exhaustivas.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

1. Ahmed, M. D., Ho, W. K. Y., Al-Haramlah, A., & Mataruna-Dos-Santos, L. J. (2020). Motivation to participate in physical activity and sports: Age transition and gender differences among India’s adolescents. Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1798633

2. Alexandru, M. A., & Lorand, B. (2015). Motor Behavior and Anticipation – A Pilot Study of Junior Tennis Players. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.084

3. Apollo, M., Mostowska, J., Legut, A., Maciuk, K., & Timothy, D. J. (2023). Gender differences in competitive adventure sports tourism. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 42, 1-14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100604

4. Black, L. I., Terlizzi, E. P., & Vahratian, A. (2022). Organized Sports Participation Among Children Aged 6-17 Years: United States, 2020. NCHS Data Brief, 441, 1–8.

5. Bompa, T. O., & Buzzichelli, C. A. (2018). Periodization Theory and Methodology of Training (Sixth Edit). Human Kinetics.

6. Breuer, C., Hallmann, K., & Wicker, P. (2011). Determinants of sport participation in different sports. Managing Leisure, 16(4), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606719.2011.613625

7. Coutinho, P., Ramos, A., Afonso, J., Bessa, C., Ribeiro, J., Davids, K., Fonseca, A. M., & Mesquita, I. (2023). To Sample or to Specialise? Sport Participation Patterns of Youth Team Sport Male Players. Children, 10(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10040729

8. Eime, R. M., Harvey, J. T., Charity, M. J., Casey, M. M., Westerbeek, H., & Payne, W. R. (2016). Age profiles of sport participants. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-016-0031-3

9. Eime, R., Harvey, J., Charity, M., & Westerbeek, H. (2020). Longitudinal trends in sport participation and retention of women and girls. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 2, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00039

10. Emmonds, S., Till, K., Weaving, D., Burton, A., & Lara-Bercial, S. (2024). Youth Sport Participation Trends Across Europe: Implications for Policy and Practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 95(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2148623

11. Foppiano-Vilo, G., Matus-Castillo, C., & Cornejo-Améstica, M. (2022). Barriers, facilitators and strategies that influence women’s participation on boards of directors of Chilean sports federations. Retos, 44, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.47197/RETOS.V44I0.90136

12. Frick, B. (2011). Gender differences in competitiveness: Empirical evidence from professional distance running. Labour Economics, 18(3), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2010.11.004

13. Hopkins, C. S., Hopkins, C., Kanny, S., & Watson, A. (2022). A Systematic Review of Factors Associated with Sport Participation among Adolescent Females. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063353

14. Kwon, S., Letuchy, E. M., Levy, S. M., & Janz, K. F. (2021). Youth sports participation is more important among females than males for predicting physical activity in early adulthood: Iowa bone development study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031328

15. Llanes, A. C., Deckey, D. G., Zhang, N., Curley, K. L., Curley, N. D., Chhabra, A., & Neal, M. T. (2023). Lower-Extremity Injuries Predominate in American High School Tennis Players. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 5(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100811

16. Mainer-Pardos, E., Villavicencio Álvarez, V. E., Moreno-Apellaniz, N., Gutiérrez-Logroño, A., & Calero-Morales, S. (2024). Effects of a neuromuscular training program on the performance and inter-limb asymmetries in highly trained junior male tennis players. Heliyon, 10(5), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27081

17. Maksum, A., & Indahwati, N. (2021). Patterns of physical activity and its impact on health risk and life satisfaction: An evidence from adults in Indonesia. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 9(6), 1087–1096. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2021.090602

18. Meyer, K. L., & Roche, K. M. (2017). Sports-for-development gender equality impacts from a basketball programme : Shifts in attitudes and stereotyping in Senegalese youth and coaches. Journal of Sport for Development, 5(9), 49–57.

19. Molanorouzi, K., Khoo, S., & Morris, T. (2015). Motives for adult participation in physical activity: Type of activity, age, and gender Health behavior, health promotion and society. BMC Public Health, 15(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1429-7

20. Monteiro, Di., Borrego, C. C., Silva, C., Moutão, J., Marinho, D. A., & Cid, L. (2018). Motivational Climate Sport Youth Scale: Measurement Invariance Across Gender and Five Different Sports. Journal of Human Kinetics, 61(1), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0124

21. Mutohir, T. C., Lutan, R., Maksum, A., Kristiyanto, A., & Akbar, R. (2021). Laporan Nasional Sport Development Index Tahun 2021. Kementerian Pemuda Dan Olahraga Republik Indonesia, 1–126. https://deputi3.kemenpora.go.id/dokumen/30/laporan-nasional-sport-development-index-tahun-2021

22. Ngatman, Hidayatullah, M. F., Sugiyanto, & Purnama, S. K. (2024). Developing authentic assessment instrument for fundamental forehand and backhand groundstroke techniques using an actions-based method. Heliyon, 10(5), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26203

23. Ngatman, N., Hermawan, H. A., Komari, A., Solikhin, M. N., & Sunaryo, S. (2024). Ngatman Ngatman, Hedi Ardiyanto Hermawan, Amat Komari, Muhamad Nanang Solikhin, Sunaryo Sunaryo Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (Indonesia). Retos, 2041, 584–594.

24. Rüeger, E., Javet, M., Born, D. P., Heyer, L., & Romann, M. (2023). Why age categories in youth sport should be eliminated: Insights from performance development of youth s long jumpers. Frontiers in Physiology, 14(January), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1051208

25. Schluga Filho, J. L., Romanovitch Ribas, M., de Oliveira Nogueira, L., de Andrade, C., Fernandes, P., & Bassan, J. C. (2016). Profile motor and morphological tennis players of the type of field of 11 to 15 years. Revista Andaluza de Medicina Del Deporte, 9(3), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ramd.2014.11.003

26. Soares, A. L. A., & Carvalho, H. M. (2023). Burnout and dropout associated with talent development in youth sports. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 5(June), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2023.1190453

27. Sotiriadou, K. (Popi), & Shilbury, D. (2009). Australian Elite Athlete Development: An Organisational Perspective. Sport Management Review, 12(3), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2009.01.002

28. Strandbu, Å., Bakken, A., & Sletten, M. A. (2019). Exploring the minority–majority gap in sport participation: different patterns for boys and girls? Sport in Society, 22(4), 606–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1389056

29. Warner, S., & Dixon, M. A. (2015). Competition, gender and the sport experience: an exploration among college athletes. Sport, Education and Society, 20(4), 527–545.

30. Xu, J., Xu, W., & Sang, M. (2024). Study of the synergistic effect of analogical and explicit learning in beginning junior tennis players. Heliyon, 10(19), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38590

Descargas

Publicado

10-09-2026

Cómo citar

Khusni, I., Tomoliyus, Alim, A., Nurmahdi, H., & Ismail. (2026). Diferencias de género en la participación en competiciones entre tenistas júnior según la edad. SPORT TK-Revista EuroAmericana De Ciencias Del Deporte, 15, 79. Recuperado a partir de https://sportk.eu/article/view/226

Número

Vol. 15 (2026)

Sección

Artículos

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2026 Issadam Khusni, Tomoliyus, Abdul Alim, Hilman Nurmahdi, Ismail Gani

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Copyright © by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.