Validity and reliability evidence for the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale among Spanish secondary school students in physical education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.68574/sportk.424Keywords:
Self-Determination Theory, Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness, Need-Based ExperiencesAbstract
The present study aimed to adapt the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale to the Spanish Physical Education (PE) context and to provide validity and reliability evidence for use among secondary school students. A purposive sample of 1,604 secondary school students (831 boys, 51.8%; 761 girls, 47.4%; and 12 with missing gender information, 0.7%; mean age = 15.01, SD = 1.32) participated in this cross-sectional study. The students received two mandatory 60-minute coeducational physical education (PE) lessons per week. Convergent validity was met with average variance extracted values ranging from .50 to .65. Discriminant validity was established with latent correlations ranging from -.54 to .78, and from -.53 to .82 for the heterotrait–monotrait ratio of correlations. Internal consistency was supported by acceptable Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega, and Raykov’s rho values for six primary-order factors, and by satisfactory coefficient scores for the two hierarchical factors. Temporal stability was met through intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from .70 to .85. Structural equation analyses provided criterion validity evidence, showing positive relationships between need satisfaction and autonomous motivation, and between need frustration with controlled motivation and amotivation. The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale has been shown to be a valid and reliable instrument for measuring secondary school students’ perceptions of need satisfaction and need frustration in the Spanish physical education (PE) context.
Downloads
References
1. Abós, Á., Burgueño, R., García-González, L., & Sevil-Serrano, J. (2022). Influence of internal and external controlling teaching behaviors on students’ motivational outcomes in physical education: Is there a gender difference? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 41(3), 502–512. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2020-0316
2. Bartholomew, K. J., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Psychological need thwarting in the sport context: Assessing the darker side of athletic experience. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33(1), 75–102. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.33.1.75
3. Burgueño, R., García-González, L., Abós, Á., & Sevil-Serrano, J. (2023). Students’ need satisfaction and frustration profiles: Differences in outcomes in physical education and physical activity-related variables. European Physical Education Review, 29(4), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X231165229
4. Burgueño, R., Sánchez-Gallardo, I., Macarro-Moreno, J., Lirola, M. J., & Medina-Casaubón, J. (2019). Examining maladaptive functioning in physical education: A psychometric analysis of the psychological need thwarting scale among Spanish secondary students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 126(6), 1158–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512519868368
5. Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Duriez, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., & Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1
6. Commission, I. T. (2018). ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition). International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166
7. Cordeiro, P., Paixão, P., Lens, W., Lacante, M., & Sheldon, K. (2016). Factor structure and dimensionality of the balanced measure of psychological needs among Portuguese high school students. Relations to well-being and ill-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 47(April), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.010
8. Ferriz, R., González-Cutre, D., & Sicilia, Á. (2015). Revision of the perceived locus of causality scale (PLOC) to include the measure of integrated regulation in physical education. Revista de Psicología Del Deporte, 24(2), 329–338.
9. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
10. García-González, L., Haerens, L., Abós, Á., Sevil-Serrano, J., & Burgueño, R. (2023). Is high teacher directiveness always negative? Associations with students’ motivational outcomes in physical education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104216
11. Grubbs, J. B., Tóth-Király, I., Nagy, L., Koós, M., Kraus, S. W., Demetrovics, Z., Potenza, M. N., Ballester-Arnal, R., Batthyány, D., Bergeron, S., Billieux, J., Briken, P., Burkauskas, J., Cárdenas-López, G., Carvalho, J., Castro-Calvo, J., Chen, L., Strong, C., Ciocca, G., … Bőthe, B. (2025). Basic psychological needs satisfaction: An international examination of invariance across 22 languages and 32 countries. Motivation and Emotion, 49, 552-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-025-10151-z
12. Haerens, L., Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Soenens, B., & Van Petegem, S. (2015). Do perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching relate to physical education students’ motivational experiences through unique pathways? Distinguishing between the bright and dark side of motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16(3), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.08.013
13. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
14. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
15. Longo, Y., Gunz, A., Curtis, G. J., & Farsides, T. (2016). Measuring need satisfaction and frustration in educational and work contexts: The need satisfaction and frustration scale (NSFS). Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(1), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9595-3
16. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
17. Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857
18. Moreno-Murcia, J. A., González-Cutre, D., Chillón-Garzón, M., & Parra-Rojas, N. (2008). Adaptation of the basic psychological needs in exercise scale to physical education. Revista Mexicana de Psicologia, 25(2), 295–303.
19. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory. Basic psychological needs in motivation, development and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.7202/1041847ar
20. SHAPE America—Society of Health and Physical Educators. (2014). National standards & grade-level outcomes for K-12 physical education. Human Kinetics.
21. Sicilia, A., Ferriz, R., & Sáenz-Álvarez, P. (2013). Spanish validation of the psychological needs thwarting scale in exercise. Psychology, Society, & Education, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v5i1.493
22. Sireci, S., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2014). Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema, 26(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256
23. Tilga, H., Hein, V., Koka, A., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). How Physical Education teachers’ interpersonal behaviour is related to students’ health-related quality of life. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(5), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595718
24. Tilga, H., Kalajas-Tilga, H., Hein, V., Raudsepp, L., & Koka, A. (2020). How does perceived autonomy-supportive and controlling behaviour in physical education relate to adolescents’ leisure-time physical activity participation? Kinesiology, 52(2), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.26582/k.52.2.13
25. Van den Berghe, L., Vansteenkiste, M., Cardon, G., Kirk, D., & Haerens, L. (2014). Research on self-determination in physical education: Key findings and proposals for future research. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.732563
26. Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., Soenens, B., Ryan, R. M., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2020). Manual of the Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale (BPNSFS). Ghent University.
27. Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1
28. Vasconcellos, D., Parker, P. D., Hilland, T., Cinelli, R., Owen, K. B., Kapsal, N., Lee, J., Antczak, D., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R. M., & Lonsdale, C. (2020). Self-Determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(7), 1444–1469. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000420
29. Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval, E. (2017). A journey around alpha and omega to estimate internal consistency reliability. Anales de Psicologia/ Annals of Psychology, 33(3), 755–782. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.33.3.268401
30. Vlachopoulos, S. P., & Michailidou, S. (2006). Development and initial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: The basic psychological needs in exercise scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 10(3), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327841mpee1003_4
31. Zamarripa, J., Rodríguez-Medellín, R., Pérez-Garcia, J. A., Otero-Saborido, F., & Delgado, M. (2020). Mexican Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scale in Physical Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00253
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ginés David López García, Francisco Javier Gil Espinosa, Rafael Burgueño Menjibar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright © by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.
