Mapping the landscape of sports law: a bibliometric analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.727821Keywords:
Arbitration, Doping, Bibliometric Analysis, Interdisciplinary Legal Research, Sports LawAbstract
The aim of this study was to examine the research field of sports law through bibliometric techniques, highlighting thematic trends, subject focus, and the progression of legal discourse. The study highlights the evolution of sports law into an interdisciplinary domain that intersects governance, health, human rights, and arbitration. The study utilizes bibliometric analysis, drawing on data from the Scopus database spanning 1983 to 2025. VOSviewer facilitates co-occurrence, clustering, and network analysis. It delineates publication patterns, leading countries, major subject areas, and keyword interrelationships to provide a systematic assessment of the field's development. There has been a significant increase in publications since 2010, peaking in 2021 and 2024. The United States and the United Kingdom are the primary contributors, with Social Sciences accounting for the largest share of publications. Four principal thematic clusters emerge: arbitration and fundamental rights, athlete welfare, regulatory governance, and legal issues related to doping and equity. Keyword analysis identifies "sports law" as the central keyword, together with terms such as arbitration, anti-doping, and human rights. The findings aid policymakers, legal scholars, and sports organizations in understanding research trends, supporting informed policymaking, and addressing issues related to doping, discrimination, and athlete rights. This is one of the few comprehensive bibliometric analyses in sports law, connecting academic knowledge with practical legal and societal needs.
Downloads
References
1. Anderson, J. (2010). Modern sports law: a textbook. Bloomsbury Publishing.
2. Bergkvist, L., & Skeiseid, H. (2024). Sportswashing: exploiting sports to clean the dirty laundry. International Journal of Advertising, 43(6), 1091-1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2024.2310937
3. Brown, A., & Miller, S. (2022). Sports legislation in the internet era: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Sports Policy, 15(4), 89–104.
4. Douglas, J., Owers, R., & Campbell, M. L. (2022). Social licence to operate: what can equestrian sports learn from other industries?. Animals, 12(15), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12151987
5. Garcia, L., & Weber, M. (2023). European Sports Law: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of International Sports Law, 18(2), 33–50.
6. Gómez, B. V., & Alfaro, E. (2020). La participación de las mujeres en el último tercio del siglo XX y la ruptura de estereotipos en el deporte. In Diálogos sobre el deporte (1975-2020) (pp. 202-220). INDE Publicaciones.
7. Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The concept of law. OUP Oxford.
8. Ilevbare, S., & McPherson, G. (2025). Isomorphism in sport diplomacy: examining the nexus between international law, sportswashing and the contested role of mega events owners. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 17(3), 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2025.2457755
9. Johnson, P., & Taylor, R. (2021). Global Documentation Trends in Legal Systems. Comparative Law Review, 25(1), 12–28.
10. Kitchin, P. J., & Howe, P. D. (2013). How can the social theory of Pierre Bourdieu assist sport management research?. Sport Management Review, 16(2), 123-134.
11. Klarin, A. (2024). How to conduct a bibliometric content analysis: Guidelines and contributions of content co‐occurrence or co‐word literature reviews. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(2), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.13031
12. Lee, H., & Kim, S. (2020). Documentation Practices in Small Nations: A Global Perspective. Journal of Global Governance, 10(3), 67–82.
13. Loland, S. (2010). Fairness in sport. The ethics of sports. A reader, 14, 116-124. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367766924-RESS179-1
14. Lubelska-Sazanów, M. (2025). Ethics in sports industry: when does sports autonomy become an excuse for animal abuse?. International Journal of Law in Context, 21(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552324000193
15. Mann, G., Dubnov-Raz, G., Golan, R., & Tsur, A. (2013). The importance and composition of pre-season examination in sportsmen. Harefuah, 152(4), 190-249.
16. María Pérez Gázquez, I., & Barquero-Ruiz, C. (2024). Gender equality in women’s professional sport. Progress and pending challenges. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte 19(59), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.12800/ccd.v19i59.2113
17. Mazzucco, M., & Findlay, H. (2023). From Sagen to Henriques: Legal Challenges to Olympic Event Selection Decisions and the Role of the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Liverpool Law Review, 44(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-022-09316-4
18. McLeish, H. J. (2020). Should the UK Law Regulate Sporting Matters? A Critical Investigation on How the UK Can Formally Develop Sports Law to Tackle the Growing Legal Disputes (Doctoral dissertation, University of the West of Scotland (United Kingdom)).
19. Miossi, L., & Prewitt-White, T. (2021). Gender Discrimination in Sport. In The Routledge Handbook of Clinical Sport Psychology (pp. 165-177). Routledge.
20. Mirsafian, H., Mirsoleimani, M., Afshari, M., & Akhavan, E. (2022). Effect of educational intervention on sports law concepts on the attitude, knowledge, and behavior of coaches. Physical Culture and Sport, 97(1), 21-31.
21. Murray, S. (2012). The two halves of sports-diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 23(3), 576-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2012.706544
22. Nogueira, A., Molinero, O., Salguero, A., Lucidi, F., & Márquez, S. (2018). Identification of gender discrimination in sports: Training of agents of change. Revista de Psicología del Deporte, 27(3), 43-49.
23. Smith, J., & Stewart, R. (2019). The progression of sports law: Globalization and commercialization in the 21st century. Journal of Sports Law and Governance, 12(3), 45–67.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright © by the authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, meaning that anyone may download and read the paper for free. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. These conditions allow for maximum use and exposure of the work, while ensuring that the authors receive proper credit.





























